Tuesday, August 31, 2010

Renewal Week: What Goes In and What Stays Out

When you’re setting out to renew your donors, you’ve got a big, but simple task: convince people who’ve supported you in the past that you’re worthy of continued support for the coming year. Which means your Renewal letter needs to:

  • Let them know that it’s time to renew.
  • Tell them what their past support has accomplished.
  • Thank them for their loyalty and generosity.
  • Remind them of who you are, what you do and why they joined in the first place.
  • Explain why it’s so important and urgent that they renew their support TODAY.

You can do all of this quickly – ideally in two pages – and efficiently, without the supporting details that you include in an acquisition or appeal letter.

That’s what’s in. So what’s out?

As I mentioned, you don’t want to go into too much detail in a Renewal. Save the nitty gritty details for other donor communications. Your Renewal is a broad brush portrait of what your donor helps you accomplish each year.

Leave out the demands. Yes, the Renewal gift is important. But it’s not going to come if you take your donors’ support for granted.

Next up: how to make your Renewal letters as compelling as possible.

Monday, August 30, 2010

Renewal Week: The Most Important Ask You Make

In the next few weeks, I’m beginning to sit down and start working on the annual renewal letters for a few of my clients, so it seemed like a good time to talk about Renewals.

A donor’s annual gift renewing their support of your organization is the single most important gift you get.

  • It gives your organization reliable annual support
  • Each year of giving firms the donor's bond with your organization
  • Each Renewal gift means you have one more year of opportunities to ask for special donations, planned giving, and other additional contributions
  • Many of your high-dollar donors (as well as your bequests, etc.) come from your pool of loyal donors who renew year after year

For all of these reasons, it’s critical that you do not give short shrift to your Renewal program. And a key part of that program are the Renewal letters.

This week, I’m going to talk about the various things that should be in your Renewal letters…and what shouldn’t, how to make your Renewal letters as compelling as possible, and other various tips for a robust Renewal series.

In the meantime, check out this oldie but goodie on Renewal series length. And don't forget to leave any questions in the comments below.

Thursday, August 26, 2010

Preview -- Renewals!

Next week is Renewal Week here at Communicating Your Conscience.

I'll be devoting a series of posts to how to write a Renewal and how it's different than your other donor communications. Check in for tips on making your donors feel valued, upgrading them and, most important of all, bonding them to your organization so they give year after year.

Questions? Post 'em below!

Tuesday, August 24, 2010

Ask Richelle -- Letter Signers

Last week, Catherine asked a question that I've heard from many of my clients over the years:

"How important is it that the letter (or email) come from the President of the organization? Should different people be used as signers depending on the audience? For example-we mail to architects and also to building owners (I work for a green building non-profit). Would I use the same signer for each letter?"

Sometimes, who signs a fundraising letter (or e-mail) can be one of the most contentious points in planning a direct mail campaign. Which is funny because my answer is very, very simple.

The signer -- and there should only be one! -- should always be the person with the most name recognition on the particular issue you're addressing in the mailing.

So why is this very simple thing so complicated to put into practice?

The reasons are endless. A nonprofit might have two figureheads (a President and an Executive Director, say) who both feel they should be the ones signing letters to donors. Or it could have one leader who is very well-known for one specific issue -- even though the organization is working on several issues -- who insists on signing everything. A nonprofit might have oodles of celebrity support, but be afraid to ask for celebrity signers. And on and on.

Which is why Catherine's question is such a good one. Organizations should consider each letter they send out as a new opportunity to bond with their donors. Which means they should think carefully about what issue will do that and who the best person in the organization is to address that issue.

In an organization with a particularly strong or charismatic leader, it might be that leader every time. In Catherine's case, in an organization that has two distinct audiences, there may be one leader who is perfect for addressing the architects, and one for the building owners. Or, if she wants to engage her membership, she could ask one prominent industry leader who is also a donor to sign a letter to his or her peers.

One environmental group I work for has a celebrity -- in this case, an actor well-known for his environmental advocacy -- sign a letter for them a few times a year, while the executive director signs everything else.

Above all, your letter should always have only one signer. Remember, fundraising letters are personal letters from your organization to your donor. They should speak directly to that donor, person-to-person. And they can't do that if they're signed by two people.

More questions? Ask 'em below!

Tuesday, August 17, 2010

Nonprofits and Social Media -- to Dive or Not to Dive?

I was cruising through Nancy Schwartz's Getting Attention! site, when I stumbled across this thoughtful and thought-provoking article about social media and nonprofits.

I've noticed quite a few of my nonprofit clients -- and really, the rest of us ordinary folks, too -- wondering how to use social media for marketing purposes, how much time to spend on social media, and how to measure its impacts on our marketing or fundraising efforts.

As Nancy reports, there are a lot of social media fundraising success stories floating around, seducing nonprofits into jumping whole-hog into social media. But are those organizations getting back what they're putting in? And, even more important, are they sacrificing the tried and true for what's hot right now?

Nancy's emphasis is on the "marketing cornerstones -- from planning to getting to know your audiences, crafting relevant messages, defining the best channels to engage those folks in productive conversation and action, and measuring the impact of your work."

I agree.

Look, social media is a fascinating frontier! I enjoy Facebook. Twitter keeps me in the loop on what's going on with my industry and in the worlds of my clients. I'd love to spend more time getting acquainted with all the features on LinkedIn. And I am certain there are other social media tools I haven't even heard of that could revolutionize the way I work.

But I owe it to my clients to devote my energies where I know they'll make a difference, with the proven techniques that got us to this place.

Don't get me wrong. When I'm working on a direct mail letter, I take a minute to think about how to incorporate the theme or campaign into social media. A few months ago, a client was working on a "Top Ten" campaign, and I suggested Tweeting one item from the top ten every day for ten days as a way to inform their followers (and their followers' followers through re-Tweets) of the campaign, drive traffic to their website, and, hopefully, boost awareness of and response to the direct mail campaign. It was one of their most successful fundraising efforts of the year so far.

But would that campaign have been so successful without the more traditional cornerstones of marketing? If their "Top Ten" hadn't been so honed specifically for their audience? If they'd ignored direct mail -- for them, a proven fundraising tool -- in favor of a web-only ask?

The Twitter portion of this client's campaign almost certainly enhanced what they were doing, if nothing else, by raising awareness among a slightly different population using a new medium. But it couldn't have replaced the other legs of the campaign.

It's important for everyone to start thinking about how to incorporate social media into their marketing/fundraising plans. But social media shouldn't take the place of a solid, multi-faceted marketing/fundraising plan. Or in other words, go ahead and dive in, but make sure the water is deep enough.


Tuesday, August 10, 2010

Ask Richelle

Last week, a reader posted a couple of questions in the comment section of one of my posts on Acquisition, and I wanted to pull it out and answer it in the blog.

Amy asked: Any advice on we can transfer these (or other!) strategies translate to e-mail?

This is probably the number one question I get asked these days. Everyone wants to know how they can make more money from their e-mail and web efforts. And why not? It’s cheaper and faster than traditional mail, and it’s a better way to reach the younger donors that will become the future of your organization.

The good news is that a lot of what you do in direct mail can be translated to e-mail and online. You still want to convey your passion, highlight the emotions and urgency of the problem you’re trying to solve, and ask, ask ask.

But the way you do these things in e-mail and online is a bit different.

  • You’ve got to get to the point quickly – no build-up, no big explanation. Just hit them with the problem, the urgency and the solution (give!).
  • Include several links to your donation page.
  • Make sure it’s absolutely clear what their donation will do.
  • Include a photo or two, but make sure they are directly related to your content, or they’ll only serve to distract.

Check out this e-mail appeal from EDF as posted on The Agitator for a few more ideas. (Although I agree with the many people who commented that the EDF copywriting was not emotional enough!)

Also – and here’s the bad news – don’t forget that e-mail and online appeals haven’t yet eclipsed direct mail for most organizations. It’s far too easy to delete an e-mail, or navigate off a web page. So don’t think that you can replace your mail with online efforts quite yet.

But they can supplement what you’re doing in the mail, as long as you do it right.

Thursday, August 5, 2010

Acquisition Week -- Urgency and Passion…and an Involvement Device Doesn’t Hurt

Thanks for coming back for the final installment in the Acquisition Series. So far, I've covered how to approach potential donors, how to craft your package, choosing your lead, and establishing your credibility.

Today, I want to talk about a few of the other techniques you can use to get people to give to your cause for the first time. As with special appeals to your donors, urgency and passion are key. It’s hard enough to get people to support a new cause. Throw in the multitude of distractions between your potential donor and his wallet, and you’ve got to provide strong motivation to get him to sit down right this second and make that initial gift.

Besides killer prose, there are a couple of ways you can provide that extra bit of motivation. Lots of organizations love freebies. Magnets, address labels, stickers you can use to guilt a donor into giving. Or you can entice them with promises of a free gift – a DVD produced by your organization, for example – after they join. They’re both great ways to raise your response.

One caveat: the gift you’re offering should relate to your mission. I hate it when environmental organizations offer calendars or notecards – even with beautiful pictures of nature on them – because of the wasted paper. Make it matter to your mission.

For activist organization, almost nothing beats a petition or a survey. People who are passionate about your cause – and if you’ve picked your lists right, they should be – love to make their voices heard. So give them that chance. Sure, you might get back a bunch of signed petitions or completed surveys with no money…but guess who your best prospects are next time around?

And maybe the single most important way to craft a winning Acquisition Package: TESTING.

Don't toss all of these techniques into one package and hope they work. Create different versions and mail them against each other. See what brings you the best results. Test, test, and test again.

I hope you'v found the Acquisition series helpful. Please post any questions in the comments, and I'll be sure to answer them!